Skip to main content

Dustan Hansen

Corryong Cup 2026 · Task 3 (Floater) (Wed, 7 Jan 2026) · floater · ranked #3 · times in Australia/Melbourne (GMT+11)

Scores computed

Made goal in 3:25:13 — 397.9 points

Loading map...

The flight

What the tracklog shows, and which crossings scored.

How this works

Crossed the start cylinder boundary 5 times. The scored start is the latest crossing from which the flight still makes its best run along the course — re-starting supersedes an earlier start, while simply flying back through the cylinder later in the task changes nothing.
The 16:21:53 crossing is the scored start. By the 16:38:01 crossing the flight had already reached TP3 (TOWONG), so treating that as a re-start would mean flying the course again from there — a shorter, later run that scores less.
Start time taken: the start gate — the speed-section clock runs from the gate, not from the crossing (FAI S7F §8.3.1).13:30:00
Completed the task — full task distance is credited.

Day quality — points on offer

Task validity 65.01% of a perfect day, so 650.1 of 1000 points were available.

How this works

Launch validity — the day counts for less if much of the field never got into the air.96.13%

17 pilots flew out of 20 present. Nominal launch is 96%, so launch validity is full once 20 pilots are in the air.

Distance validity — the day counts for less if the field as a whole did not get far.67.63%

Measured against a 15.8 km nominal distance, a 30% nominal goal and a 5.0 km minimum distance. The field flew 5.4 km past the minimum on average, with a best of 22.5 km.

How far the field got — the spread distance validity is computed from, one dot per pilot. 17 pilots flew; you flew 22.5 km, further than 13 of them. The day averaged 5.4 km past the 5.0 km minimum, against a 15.8 km nominal distance.
Time validity — the day counts for less if the fastest pilot got round much quicker than the task was meant to take.100%

The fastest pilot took 1:49:58 against a nominal task time of 1:30:00 — the task took as long as it was meant to, so no time devaluation applies.

Points on offer for the day650.1 pts

1000 × 0.9613 × 0.6763 × 1.00 = 650.1

Split between the components: 4 of 17 pilots made goal — a goal ratio of 0.24

distance 387.1 · time 184.1 · leading 46 · arrival 32.9

The share each component takes of the day

distance 59.5% · time 28.3% · leading 7.1% · arrival 5.1%

Distance points

387.1 pts

How this works

Task distance22.5 km

The optimized task line — the shortest legal way round the turnpoints.

Scored distance22.5 km

Measured along the optimized task line, up to the furthest point on course.

Best distance in class22.5 km
Made goal — full available distance points.387.1 pts
The curve is the distance-points formula, half of it built from where the field landed out (FAI S7F §11.1.1) — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. Its steepest stretches are the ones fewest pilots got past, so flying through one is worth more than the same distance somewhere easy. You flew 22.5 km of the class best 22.5 km, worth 387.1 of 387.1.

Time points

0 pts

How this works

Time points use the 5⁄6 speed-fraction exponent (the current FAI S7F, S7F §11.2).
Your speed section time3:25:13

Timed from your 13:30:00 start gate to the end of the speed section (FAI S7F §8.7) — you crossed the start at 16:21:53.

Fastest time in class1:49:58
Time points fall off with the gap to the fastest time0 pts

speed fraction = max(0, 1 − ((T − Tbest) ÷ √Tbest)^5⁄6) = 0.000; × 184.1 available = 0 (times in hours)

The curve is the time-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You were 1:35:15 behind the fastest time, which cost 184.1 of the 184.1 time points on offer.

Leading points

0 pts

How this works

Leading points reward flying out front during the speed section — the pilot with the best leading coefficient takes all available leading points, others fall off with the gap.0 pts
Your leading coefficient — the area under your distance-over-time curve, so lower means further ahead for longer6.178

Best in class 2.597.

Leading points fall off with the gap to the best coefficient0 pts

leading factor = max(0, 1 − ((LC − LCbest)² ÷ LCbest)^1⁄3) = 0.000; × 46 available = 0

Measured with the classic squared-distance leading coefficient (S7F §11.3.1, the hang-gliding / GAP2016–2018 variant).
The curve is the leading-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. Your coefficient of 6.178 against the class best of 2.597 puts you at 0 of 46.

Arrival points

10.9 pts

How this works

Arrival points reward crossing the end of the speed section early relative to the other pilots who reached it.10.9 pts
Reached the end of the speed section 3rd of 416:55:13

The arrival order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed — an earlier start gate can put a slower pilot ahead of a faster one here.

Arrival points fall off steeply with each place10.9 pts

arrival ratio = 1 − (3 − 1) ÷ 4 = 0.50; arrival factor = 0.2 + 0.037·r + 0.13·r² + 0.633·r³ = 0.330; × 32.9 available = 10.9

One place earlier would have been worth 7.8 more points

The curve is front-loaded: first place takes all 32.9 available, and everyone else who reaches the end of the speed section keeps at least 7.5 of them.

The curve is the arrival-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You arrived 3 of 4, worth 10.9 of 32.9 — one place earlier would have been 7.8 more. The order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed.

Total

397.9 pts

How this works

Distance + time + leading + arrival, minus penalties397.9 pts

387.1 + 0.0 + 10.9 ≈ 397.9 — the points above are shown rounded to 0.1; the total is rounded from their exact sum.

Where the points went

Your 397.9 against the 650.1 that won the class.

How this works

Distancelevel

you 387.1, the leader 387.1

Time−184.1 pts

you 0, the leader 184.1

Leading−46 pts

you 0, the leader 46

Arrival−22 pts

you 10.9, the leader 32.9

Behind Nicole Forrester−252.2 pts

Spread across 3 components.